Teachers’ Euphemism on Language Learning
Sociolinguistics Study in Higer Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v8i2.1803Keywords:
Euphemism, Teachers, Students, Learning, InputAbstract
The goal of this research was to identify the teachers' euphemism language in language learning, as well as the roles of euphemism in supporting students' language learning. This was a qualitative research that used a descriptive case study approach. This qualitative descriptive study explored teachers’ use of euphemism in language learning and examined its role in supporting students’ learning motivation. This study's participants included students and teachers from Madura University. Data on euphemism and its effects on language development were gathered through observation and interviews. The results of the study showed that there were five euphemisms used by instructors in language learning: (1) outspoken, (2) large boned, (3) curvaceous, (4) distinctive, and (5) exceptional. 25 % of students claim that professors use "outspoken" instead of "bossy", "big boned" instead of "large", "curvy" instead of "fat", "unique" instead of "odd or weird", and "special" instead of "conforming with expectations". Teachers employed euphemisms in language learning to avoid using taboo words, to save pupils from losing face, to reduce students' fear, and to motivate them. According to the student responses, 62.5 % students declared that the usage of euphemism was to avoid taboo words, 12.5 % students believed that it was to prevent losing face of the students, and 12.5 % students’ claimed that it decreased the anxiety level of the students, and 12.5 % students stated that was to inspire the students. It indicated that proper words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and utterances in language acquisition were essential for motivating pupils and creating a meaningful language environment. These findings highlight the importance of polite and motivating linguistic strategies in fostering effective learning interactions in higher education.
References
Amiruddin, Mohammad, and Ukhti Raudhatul Jannah. 2022a. “The Effectiveness of Natural Approach on Language Learning in Higher Education.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovation in Education and Pedagogy (ICIEP 2020) 619(Iciep 2020):120–29. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.211219.023.
Amiruddin, Mohammad, and Ukhti Raudhatul Jannah. 2022b. “The Role of Speech Style between Teacher and Student in Learning English.” 16(1). doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v16i1.17787.
Amiruddin, Mohammad, and Chairul Fajar Tafrilyanto. 2018. “Teacher-Students Closeness in Learning English at SMK Nadhlatun Nasyiin Kadur Pamekasan.” Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama 5(2):37. doi: 10.30734/jpe.v5i2.74.
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education.
Damayanti, Galieh, Trisna Andarwulan, and Aswadi Aswadi. 2019. “Mekanisme Eufemisme Dan Sensorisasi: Kekerasan Simbolik Dalam Tuturan Dosen.” RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya 12(2):223. doi: 10.26858/retorika.v12i2.9101.
Education, Language. 2023. “J-LELC.” 3:63–72.
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, Adam R. Raimond, M. Theresa Balinghasay, and Jilana S. Boston. 2016. “‘Special Needs’ Is an Ineffective Euphemism.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 1(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0025-4.
H. Fauzi, Hafizin, Muhammad Sukri, and Burhanuddin Burhanuddin. 2020. “Disfemisme Dan Eufemisme Dalam Teks Berita Sepak Bola Di Televisi Nasional.” Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya 3(2):104. doi: 10.31002/transformatika.v3i2.1715.
HS, Ahmad Faizin. 2019. “Sociolinguistics in Language Teaching.” Mabasan 9(2):66–77. doi: 10.26499/mab.v9i2.159.
Khalil, Yaman Muthana, and Ibtisam Jassim Mohammed. 2024. “The Effect of Euphemism as Teaching Expressions on EFL University Students ’ Performance in Producing Vocabulary.” (2019):2–8.
Kiling, Stehpanie Ninoi, and Jurianto. 2016. “The Use of Euphemism in Dr Oz Indonesia TV Show.” Anglicist 05(01):68–81.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane, and Michael H. Long. 2014. “An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research.” An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research (September):1–398. doi: 10.4324/9781315835891.
Mohammad Amiruddin, Evha Nazalatus, and Muh. Darrin. 2022. “Universitas Madura.” Journal of English Language and Pedagogy 5(2):328–34.
Mustofa, M. Ibnu, Diana Monita, Wini Ranti, Ixsir Eliya, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sunan, and Universitas Negeri Malang. 2025. “University Students’ Experiences in a Newly Established EMI Program: Motivations, Satisfaction, and Challenges.” 8:21–35.
Nursilawati, Mira, Een Nurhasanah, and Slamet Triyadi. 2021. “Analisis Eufemisme Pada Kolom Detik.Com Terkait Covid-19 Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Sekolah.” Literasi : Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Serta Pembelajarannya 5(2):317. doi: 10.25157/literasi.v5i2.5901.
Priani, Suci Nia, Burhan Eko Purwanto, and Agus Riyanto. 2021. “Eufemisme Pada Berita Surat Kabar Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama.” Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Karakter (JIPK) 6(2):1–8.
Putri, Ermira Nilansari, Laili Etika Rahmawati, Harun Joko Prayitno, and Miftakhul Huda. 2022. “Euphemism and Dysphemism on Deddy Corbuzier’s Podcast as Teaching Material for Discussion Text.” Proceedings of the International Conference of Learning on Advance Education (ICOLAE 2021) 662(Icolae 2021):459–68. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220503.044.
Sriram, Rishi. 2023. An Introduction to Research.
Watson, Roger. 2015. Quantitative Research. Vol. 29.
Yildiz, Funda Uzdu. 2021. “Use of Euphemisms in Youth Language.” Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 17(March):1117–28. doi: 10.17263/jlls.904133.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Amiruddin, Muhammad Darrin Zuhri, Evha Nazalatus, S

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



