Improving students' digital literacy through an AR-assisted e-module on fruit and seed morphology using the RICOSRE model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33503/ebio.v10i01.1299Keywords:
Augmented reality, digital literacy, e-module, RICOSREAbstract
A preliminary study showed that students' digital literacy was still at a relatively sufficient level. Digital literacy, a key 21st-century skill, is essential for Biology Education students to thrive in the digital era. This research aims to determine the effect of the e-module morphological structure of fruits and seeds based on RICOSRE assisted by AR on students' digital literacy. This study employs a quantitative approach, utilizing a quasi-experimental design with a non-randomized control-group pretest-posttest design. The research subjects were third-semester students of the S1 Biology Education program at Malang State University, with a total of 57 students divided into two classes, 31 students in the experimental class and 26 students in the control class. Data were collected using three instruments: a 20-item multiple-choice test for the cognitive dimension, a 20-item Likert-scale questionnaire for the social-emotional dimension, and an observation sheet with 5 indicators for the technical dimension, and all these instruments have been validated. The data types included test scores, questionnaire responses, and observation results. Data analysis included normality and homogeneity tests, followed by One-Way ANCOVA. The results of research showed that the use of the AR-assisted RICOSRE-based e-module had a significant effect on students’ digital literacy across all dimensions (sig. < 0.05). Future researchers may also explore the integration of AR and structured learning models like RICOSRE in other subjects to enhance various 21st-century skills.
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psichology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Badriah, L., Mahanal, S., Lukiati, B., & Saptasari, M. (2023). Collaborative mind mapping-assisted RICOSRE to promote students’ problem-solving skills. Participatory Educational Research, 10(4), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.65.10.4
Chiu, T. K. F., Sun, J. C.-Y., & Ismailov, M. (2022). Investigating the relationship of technology learning support to digital literacy from the perspective of self-determination theory. Educational Psychology, 42(10), 1263–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2074966
Churchill, N. (2020). Development of students’ digital literacy skills through digital storytelling with mobile devices. Educational Media International, 57(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1833680
Dakhi, O., Irfan, D., Jama, J., Ambiyar, A., Simatupang, W., Sukardi, S., & Zagoto, M. M. (2022). Blended learning and its implications for learning outcomes computer and basic networks for vocational high school students in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 11177–11186. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.10976
Feola, E. I. (2016). Digital Literacy and new technological perspectives. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2174–2180. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040929
Franke, J., Wang, L., Bock, K., & Wilde, J. (2021). Electronic module assembly. CIRP Annals, 70(2), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2021.05.005
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th ed). New York: Holt, Reihhart and Winston.
Gustavson, K. A., Alexopoulos, G. S., Niu, G. C., McCulloch, C., Meade, T., & Areán, P. A. (2016). Problem-solving therapy reduces suicidal ideation in depressed older adults with executive dysfunction. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2015.07.010
Hardianto, H., Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., & Setiawan, D. (2024). The effectiveness of RICOSRE-flipped classroom in improving students’ digital literacy. AIP Conf. Proc. 3106, 070025. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0214923
He, Y., Du, X., Toft, E., Zhang, X., Qu, B., Shi, J., Zhang, H., & Zhang, H. (2018). A comparison between the effectiveness of PBL and LBL on improving problem-solving abilities of medical students using questioning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1290539
Ismail, M. N. K., Supeno, S., & Rusdianto, R. (2024). Development of web-based modules to improve digital literacy and learning outcomes in science learning. Jurnal Paedagogy, 11(3), 451-461. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382286021
Kahar, A. P. (2018). Analisis literasi digital mahasiswa calon guru biologi melalui proyek video amatir berbasis potensi lokal pada mata kuliah ekologi tumbuhan. Pedagogi Hayati, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31629/ph.v2i1.330
Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2021). Practical research (12th ed). Pearson Education Limited.
Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Model pembelajaran RICOSRE yang berpotensi memberdayakan keterampilan berpikir kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Teori, Dan Pengembangan, 2(5), 676–685. https://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/9180
Mangiduyos, G. P., & Subia, G. S. (2021). Twenty-first (21st) century skills of college of education alumni. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 09(09), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.99023
Maulana, I., Suryani, N., & Asrowi, A. (2019). Augmented reality: Solusi pembelajaran IPA di era revolusi industri 4.0. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 2(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v2i1.2399
Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unraveling the digital literacy paradox: How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 085–100. https://doi.org/10.28945/1982
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Pambudi, M. A., & Windasari. (2022). Strategi guru dalam meningkatkan literasi digital pada siswa. Jurnal Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(3), 636–646. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inspirasi-manajemen-pendidikan/article/view/48999
Patmanthara, S., & Hidayat, W. N. (2018). Improving vocational high school students digital literacy skill through blended learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012076
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge.
Seruni, R., Munawaoh, S., Kurniadewi, F., & Nurjayadi, M. (2019). Pengembangan modul elektronik (e-module) biokimia pada materi metabolisme lipid menggunakan flip pdf professional. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 4(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v4i1.4672
Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4593
Soutthaboualy, T., Chatwattana, P., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2021). The blended instruction on cloud via an interactive augmented reality technology model to enhance digital literacy. Higher Education Studies, 11(3), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n3p144
Sulisetijono, S., Sunarmi, S., & Rochmah, A. N. (2023). The effectiveness of AR e-module of flower structure material on biology students’ science literacy. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i2.25747
Sumiati, I. D., Sari, E. P. K., Prasetya, F. B., Muslimah, S., & Yixuan, L. (2024). Enhancing students’ digital literacy: Evaluating the effectiveness of notion-based e-modules. Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi Dan Biologi, 7(2), 182–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v7i2.3999
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wahyuni, A., & Nayazik, A. (2023). Development of geogebra-based interactive e-modules to improve students’ digital literacy abilities. International Journal of Advance Social Sciences and Education (IJASSE), 1(4), 261–268. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377428999
Wrahatnolo, T. & Munoto. (2018). 21 st centuries skill implication on educational system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296, 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012036
Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining student roles, digital literacy, learning achievements, and motivation in online learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(8), 4388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084388
Yustina, Y., Mahadi, I., Daryanes, F., Alimin, E., & Nengsih, B. (2022). The effect of problem-based learning through blended learning on digital literacy of eleventh-grade students on excretory system material. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.38082
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Edubiotik : Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi dan Terapan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
